The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum

In this week’s Spectator, I’ve written about the appointment of Becky Francis, a former Professor of Education and Social Justice, to lead the Government’s shake-up of the national curriculum. This is significant because, in addition to rewriting the national curriculum, the Government is going to force academies and free schools to teach it. I wrote a thread on X about why this is such a disaster here. Here’s how my column begins:

The appointment of Becky Francis CBE to lead the Department for Education’s shake-up of the national curriculum is typical of Labour’s plan to embed their ideology across our institutions – or rather entrench it, since the long march is almost complete.

On the face of it, Professor Francis is “unburdened by doctrine”, to use Sir Keir Starmer’s phrase about how Labour intends to govern. As former Director of the Institute of Education and current CEO of the Education Endowment Foundation, she has the outward appearance of a technocrat. But scratch the surface and, like so many Labour appointees, she emerges as a long-standing adherent of left-wing identity politics.

After earning a PhD in Women’s Studies at the University of North London (I’m not making that up), Ms. Francis went on to become Professor of Education and Social Justice at King’s College London. She was then promoted to head of the Institute of Education, UCL’s most left-wing faculty, where she launched the Centre for Sociology of Education and Equity, a research centre dedicated to advancing “equity and social justice” in schools.

For those unfamiliar with the jargon, “equity and social justice” does not mean creating a level playing field so that all children can excel, regardless of colour or creed. It means tilting the playing field so various fashionable identity groups – women, people of colour, members of the LGBT community, people with disabilities, etc. – can win at the expense of the unfashionable – men, white people, heterosexuals, the able-bodied, etc. And helping them win by any means necessary. Not the philosophy of Martin Luther King, but Malcolm X.

You can read the rest of my piece here.

I’m not the only person to ring the alarm bell about the appointment of Ms. Francis. Tim Stanley wrote about it in the Telegraph earlier this week and David James, the Deputy Head of a leading independent school, wrote about it in the Critic. It’s worth quoting from his piece to give you a flavour of Becky Francis’s politics:

You would think that in education there would be a consensus view: namely, that schools should be orderly places which allow all children to get a good education before moving on to either university or employment. You couldn’t be more wrong. The truth is that education at both primary and secondary school levels is riven with ideologues who believe that schools are places of cruelty, that rules are oppressive, and that a knowledge-rich curriculum should be abandoned in favour of less prescriptive, more creative, skills-based courses.

Read More: The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum


The post The Intersectional Feminist Rewriting the National Curriculum appeared first on David Icke.

Candace Owens’ Message to Americans “Do not send your sons and daughters to fight in this planned war”

Candace Owens’ Powerful Message to Americans:

“Do not send your sons and daughters to fight in this planned war.

They have been planning this war for years.

Do not believe them when they say they have WMD’s.

They have been trying this strategy for years, in various… pic.twitter.com/p1A3maAFgx

— Censored Men (@CensoredMen) July 25, 2024


The post Candace Owens’ Message to Americans “Do not send your sons and daughters to fight in this planned war” appeared first on David Icke.

If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed

“If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed.”
911 9/11 pic.twitter.com/0PLnYPmfuF

— Thomas Paine (@Thomas1774Paine) July 26, 2024


The post If you tell a big enough lie and tell it frequently enough, it will be believed appeared first on David Icke.

Pacemaker Patients Experience Heartbeat Irregularities Post-‘Covid’/Flu Shot — Study

A study published Monday documented how individuals with ‘cardiac implantable electronic devices’ such as pacemakers began to experience atrial arrhythmias after injection of the Covid or Flu vaccination.

Atrial arrhythmias (AA) are problems with the rhythm of the heartbeat, something the implanted device is supposed to correct.

“..a small but statistically significant increase in the burden of AA was noted in the 3 months post vaccination compared to the preceding 3 months after the first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine (0.43 ± 9.04%, p = .028) a similar rise in AA was found following the influenza vaccine and for matched patients who did not receive the COVID-19 vaccine,” the study said in the ‘Results’ section.

Dr. Peter McCullough said on social media that he sees new cases of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm characterized by rapid and irregular beating of the atrial chambers of the heart) on a regular bases.

 

I routinely see in my practice new onset paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the COVID-19 vaccinated. If you develop atrial fibrillation, ask your doctor about the role of COVID-19 vaccination and demand a quantitative antibody test against the Spike protein. Treatment with… https://t.co/18epnJ3EGV pic.twitter.com/TnpkQXCwne

— Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® (@P_McCulloughMD) July 26, 2024

Read More: Pacemaker Patients Experience Heartbeat Irregularities Post-Covid/Flu Shot 


The post Pacemaker Patients Experience Heartbeat Irregularities Post-‘Covid’/Flu Shot — Study appeared first on David Icke.

“This is my reality after the Covid19 vaccine. I went from carrying my daughter to having her help me move”

“This is my reality after the Covid19 vaccine. I went from carrying my daughter to having her help me move. I was “forced” to take it to avoid losing my job, two and a half years later… I’m still coming out of this… tomb.” pic.twitter.com/pEu87PIDWi

— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) July 26, 2024


The post “This is my reality after the Covid19 vaccine. I went from carrying my daughter to having her help me move” appeared first on David Icke.

Digital identity security company Linx gets $33M in funding

New York-based Linx Security has secured $33 million in funding to accelerate the development of its digital identity security system. Index Ventures and Cyberstarts led the round, which included contributions from Cerca Partners, Knollwood Investment Advisory and entrepreneurs Mickey Boodaei, Rakesh Loonkar, Assaf Rappaport and Yinon Costica. Crunchbase identifies the funding as a series A round.

The company underlines the significance of a robust identity security system by citing the sobering statistics from a market report on identity-related security breaches from Verizon and the Identity Defined Security Alliance. The identity security software brings together identity, security, and IT ops teams, the company says.

Linx aims to overcome the limitations of existing identity management tools by offering identity mapping, the company says. The system gives organizations control over the entire identity lifecycle by monitoring the relationships between users, their identities, and the permissions required to access company data and resources.

“Our platform empowers organizations to navigate the complexities of identity security and governance with confidence, ensuring they stay ahead of evolving threats and regulatory requirements,” says Israel Duanis, chief executive officer and co-founder of Linx Security.

To showcase the functionality of its software, Linx identified unregulated access to a client’s code repository. This involved identifying user accounts and their corresponding owners, evaluating permissions, and assessing associated risks. The software detected that a former employee still had active and unsecured access.

“Identity is the top threat vector for the modern enterprise. Identity teams under the CISO, are struggling to cope with a growing number of tasks and suffer from antiquated legacy solutions,” says Gili Raanan, founder of Cyberstarts.

Coming out of stealth mode, the team led by Israel Duanis and Niv Goldenberg (chief product officer) is already working with companies across financial services, retail, real estate, and technology.

The post Digital identity security company Linx gets $33M in funding appeared first on David Icke.

Judges Told to Avoid Saying ‘Asylum Seekers’ and ‘Immigrants’

New guidance issued by H.M. Courts and Tribunal Service has stipulated the politically correct terms that members of the bench must use when communicating with witnesses, defendants and lawyers in courts and tribunals. The Telegraph has more.

Judges in England and Wales have been advised to avoid terms such as “asylum seekers”, “immigrant”, “gays” and “lame” in new guidance on “politically incorrect” language.

A new edition of the Equal Treatment Bench Book sets out in 350 pages how judges should communicate with witnesses, defendants and lawyers in courts and tribunals in England and Wales.

It advises that “person seeking asylum” is now preferred to “asylum seekers” as it is more humanising and warns that terms such as “immigrant”, “people seeking asylum” and “refugee” should only be used where such terms are factually correct in connection with the particular individual.

“Even then, ‘immigrant’ should be used with caution, as it can sound exclusionary, especially for a person who has lived in the UK for a long time or who has gained British nationality,” it says.

“The words ‘immigrant’ or ‘second generation immigrant’ should never be used to describe a black, Asian or ethnic minority person who was born in the UK.”

For sexual orientation, terms such as “gays/a gay” and “homosexuals/a homosexual” are ruled unacceptable. Homosexual, for example, echoes discriminatory attitudes and practices in the past, says the guidance. “Dyke or queer may be used by gay people themselves but should not be used by judges.”

Read More: Judges Told to Avoid Saying ‘Asylum Seekers’ and ‘Immigrants’


The post Judges Told to Avoid Saying ‘Asylum Seekers’ and ‘Immigrants’ appeared first on David Icke.

Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech

In a written statement to the House of Commons this morning, Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, said the following:

I have written to colleagues… about my decision to stop further commencement of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, in order to consider options, including its repeal.

At present, my Free Speech Union colleagues and I are urgently trying to clarify what it is, exactly, Bridget Phillipson has done or is intending to do. She says in her statement that she has “written to colleagues”, but we’ve contacted numerous MPs on both sides of the House and no one has received a letter from the Secretary of State about the Freedom of Speech Act. I asked a press officer at the Department for Education if he could send me a copy of it, but he said the Department does not intend to publish it. I wonder which “colleagues” Phillipson has sent it to? Or if it actually exists? So much for the new Government’s commitment to ‘transparency’.

Nevertheless, it’s clear that Phillipson intends to do something to stop the Act dead in its tracks, which is a disaster. The Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 was the one thing the Conservatives did in the last 14 years to defend freedom of speech. The reason the last government passed this Act was to address the free speech crisis in Britain’s universities (although it only applies in England). The Act does two things: it imposes a new legal duty on universities (and student unions) to uphold and promote free speech; and it creates two mechanisms to make sure they’re discharging this duty – a ‘free speech tsar’ in the Office for Students whom students, academics and visiting speakers can complain to if they think a university has breached their right to free speech, and a new statutory tort enabling them to sue a university if it’s flouted the new duty.

This decision gives the lie to the Government’s claim that it is committed to human rights. Freedom of speech is the most important human right of all because without it we cannot raise the alarm about any of our other rights being eroded. What it means is, the Government is committed to upholding those human rights it likes – such as Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to respect to privacy and a family life), which has prevented so many violent criminals and illegal immigrants from being deported – but not those it doesn’t like, such as Article 10 (the right to freedom of expression).

I don’t need to rehearse here the reasons why this Act is so necessary. Daily Sceptic readers will need no convincing that free speech now plays second fiddle in Britain’s universities to the need to protect ‘vulnerable’ students – fashionable identity groups like Muslims and trans students, but not jews and gender critical women, obviously – from ‘microaggressions’, ‘harassment’ and ‘discrimination’, i.e., hearing opinions they find disagreeable. But in case you aren’t aware of the full extent of the problem, see this Free Speech Union briefing on the subject.

Read More: Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech


The post Government Has Just Declared War on Free Speech appeared first on David Icke.

Now TMZ Suggests Trump Was Never Shot!

TMZ posted an article on Friday pointing out new images of Donald Trump’s ear show “seemingly no injury” and questioning if he was ever shot by writing, “it’s still a bit of a mystery if he got hit at all.”

“Former Prez All Ears, No Bandage,” the headline stated.

“Donald Trump’s healing well after the attempt on his life, ’cause he’s not wearing the bandage on his ear anymore — and, frankly … it’s still a bit of a mystery if he got hit at all,” TMZ wrote.

The piece comes as Democrats are spreading bizarre rumors that Trump somehow “staged” the shooting and was never actually struck by a bullet.

MSNBC host Joy Reid posted a video alleging Trump was never shot:

Joy Reid of MSNBC is now suggesting that Donald Trump was never hit by a bullet, and that his campaign and the Secret Service colluded to kill two people in a fake assassination attempt just so Trump could have a photo op.

Outrageous. Insane. Defamatory.

NBC must take Reid off… pic.twitter.com/OLXz08fbE9

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) July 18, 2024

Read More: Now TMZ Suggests Trump Was Never Shot!


The post Now TMZ Suggests Trump Was Never Shot! appeared first on David Icke.