Concerns growing over ‘flurona’ after over 160 fake cases found in England in desperate attempt to justify further restrictions of freedom and hide the mass murder and health catastrophe of the fake vaccine

As of yesterday, there were 169 people known to have contracted both Covid and the flu at the same time, according to reports.

The phenomenon, known as flurona, hit the headlines recently after Israeli health officials confirmed that an unvaccinated pregnant woman had been released from hospital after testing positive for both diseases simultaneously.

The increasing attention on the potential harms of the combined diseases has led to concerns amongst health leaders.

According to the Daily Mail, although 169 cases have been found, the number of people with flurona is likely much higher.

The illness is potentially very dangerous as health experts have said that almost a third of Covid patients who require intensive oxygen is suffering from a secondary infection.

Nadav Davidovitch, Director of the School of Public Health at Ben-Gurion University in Israel, told CNN that because “there is now both very high influenza activity and very high Covid activity, there is the option that someone will be infected with both.”

“I don’t think this is going to be a common situation, but that’s something to consider,” added Davidovitch.

One explanation for increasing cases of flurona in comparison with last year could be because of relaxing some social distancing and hygiene measures.

Read More: Concerns growing over ‘flurona’ after over 160 fake cases found in England 

Un-fake-vaccinated ICU doctor challenges clueless do-what-we-tell-you system-server Javid over mandatory jabs

Health Secretary Sajid Javid has been directly challenged by an unvaccinated hospital consultant over the government’s policy of compulsory COVID jabs for NHS staff.

During a visit to King’s College Hospital in south London, Mr Javid asked staff members on the intensive care unit about their thoughts on new rules requiring vaccination for NHS workers.

‘Free speech’ platform accused of censoring critics

A popular ‘free speech’ social network has faced repeated allegations of censorship, with many users expressing concern over its links to a Chinese billionaire

Gettr, a conservative free speech Twitter alternative led by a former adviser to ex-US President Donald Trump, has been accused of censoring users who criticize the platform and one of its backers.

The site – which has managed to draw users as big as podcast host Joe Rogan with its free speech claims – sparked accusations of hypocrisy after it banned several users, including controversial right-wing political commentator Nick Fuentes.

Fuentes was initially banned in December and had several other accounts permanently suspended from the platform this week after he reportedly called for Chinese exile billionaire Guo Wengui – whose foundation has reportedly invested in Gettr – to be deported from the United States.

White nationalist Nick Fuentes was banned an additional four times tonight from Gettr. Fuentes’ followers have now taken to spamming the platform with calls for Gettr’s fugitive Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui to be “deport[ed].”

— Zachary Petrizzo (@ZTPetrizzo) January 5, 2022

Other social media users have also complained about being banned for using prohibited keywords and criticizing Wengui – a prominent financial donor in American anti-communist circles, who also goes by the name of Miles Guo.

“I got canceled on Gettr for suggesting that Miles Guo, one of their founders, was possibly involved with the CCP. So much for free speech,” protested one man on Twitter, while another person claimed to have been banned for posting, “The owner of Gettr is Guon Wengui, a Chinese billionaire.”

Elijah Schaffer, a reporter for The Blaze, claimed this week to have been “shadow banned” on Gettr – an allegation Gettr denied – while journalist Jordan Schachtel claimed censorship on the platform was “getting worse.”

“If you speak poorly about Miles Guo (Gettr majority stakeholder) or talk about his scam crypto project, it results in an insta ban,” Schachtel alleged, adding that he would be happy to join Gettr if the social network would confirm that he could “report objectively” on Guo.

J. Michael Waller, a senior analyst at the Center for Security Policy, also expressed concern on Wednesday over the alleged “suspicious Chinese origins of #GETTR.”

Since its launch in July 2021, Gettr has attracted many American conservatives who are unhappy with the level of censorship present on more mainstream platforms, such as Twitter, which banned former President Donald Trump last year. Gettr’s team includes high-profile US conservative figures, including former Trump adviser and spokesman Jason Miller, who serves as CEO.

Mystery on Moon’s dark side solved

Chinese rover got close-up shot of ‘mysterious’ lunar object

A Chinese rover has finally made it close enough to explore an oddly-shaped object spotted on the far side of the Moon last year. The discovery was dubbed ‘mystery hut’ online.

The image of a gray cube-shaped object on the Moon’s horizon was published by Our Space, a channel affiliated with the China National Space Administration (CNSA), early last month.

The photo was taken by Chinese rover Yutu-2 when it was traversing the large Von Karman crater. It was reported at the time that it would take two to three months for the rover to reach the object.

As Yutu-2 was making its journey, people online dubbed the object ‘mystery hut’, suggesting it could also be a ‘Moon palace’ or an alien base.

The truth was revealed on Friday, when Our Space released a close-up shot of what turned out to be a simple rock lying on the rim of a crater. The rock, nevertheless, had a peculiar shape, the publication noted, adding that the team controlling the rover from Earth dubbed it ‘Jade Rabbit’.

“It’s so underwhelming it’s brilliant,” tweeted Andrew Jones, a journalist covering China’s space program.

Oh, this is amazing. Close to tears. Ourspace has published an update on the “mystery hut” and it’s so underwhelming it’s brilliant. It’s just a small rock on a crater rim that they’re now calling “jade rabbit” for its appearance. Source: https://t.co/frrMKH7RWM https://t.co/GFCIRzqmDu pic.twitter.com/jpDLDS8TZu

— Andrew Jones (@AJ_FI) January 7, 2022

Yutu-2 landed on the Moon in 2019 as part of China’s Chang’e-4 mission. It is the first rover to explore the side of the Moon not visible from Earth. 

Pathetic Mainstream Media Jump To Erroneous Conclusions (of course) About Ickonic Film ‘A Good Death?’ With The BBC’s Rhys Williams Under The Deeply False Impression That He’s A ‘Journalist’

Pathetic Mainstream Media Jump To Erroneous Conclusions (of course) About Ickonic Film ‘A Good Death?’ With The BBC’s Rhys Williams Under The Deeply False Impression That He’s A ‘Journalist’

By Jacqui Deevoy 

After trying for months to get the U.K. mainstream media interested in what I believed to be the story of the decade and being pretty much ignored, I was delighted when I was given the opportunity by Ickonic Media to shape the story into a film. 

As co-producer and presenter of ‘A Good Death?’, my main aim was to give a voice to people whose loved ones had been cruelly euthanised in NHS facilities across Britain.

They came to me one by one after I’d been interviewed by David Icke for a podcast. Within a few months, I’d spoken to countless distraught people, all telling me the same thing – that their loved ones had been killed by NHS nurses and doctors and that no one would believe them. Their heart-breaking stories were too similar to ignore.  

I did some investigating and uncovered some sinister and unsavoury truths. I got a few of the bereaved relatives onto internet radio and TV shows. I continued pitching to mainstream papers to no avail. 

Jaymie Icke, who runs Ickonic, was aware of my plight and came up with the idea of turning my pitch into a documentary. I jumped at the chance. What better way to share these horrific yet heart-rending tales! 

I loved working on ‘A Good Death?’ with Ickonic. It took three months to complete and we worked hard. Some days, towards the end, we were working on it 20 hours a day. The final edit was made on December 4th 2021 and our small team was incredibly proud of the finished product and looked forward to showing it off.

Anna Redfern, owner of a small cinema in Swansea (Cinema & Co) offered to host the premiere at the venue. Anna had been in the news for refusing to insist her customers show jab passports. As a result, she had to attend court several times and was fined £15,000. Ms. Redfern, a single mum, fought for her right to keep her business open and made a valiant attempt to stay open before Swansea council finally shut her down. Ickonic has great admiration for warrior Anna and was delighted when offered the use of the cinema to showcase ‘A Good Death?’

On December 5th, a full house watched the first public showing of the film. Families involved in the documentary were amongst those present that evening and it was a bitter-sweet thing seeing their reactions. The film can be watched here for free until 11pm on October 8th: https://www.ickonic.com/Dashboard/Watch/1163

One month later, the BBC (always a bit slow on the uptake) got wind of the film and got one of their not-so-intrepid reporters to investigate. The published hot piece was an utter joke: the reporter – Rhys Williams – had done no research whatsoever, had not contacted anyone at Ickonic (but said we didn’t respond), and had clearly not watched the film. The article was riddled with falsehoods and errors. In one paragraph, he claimed the film was produced by ‘conspiracy theorist’ David Icke; in another, he writes that it was produced by “the Icke brothers.” He wheeled out all the hackneyed old stuff about Mr. Icke snr. believing the Queen’s a lizard and that he’s the son of God (yawn) and described the film as a conspiracy theory movie. (Double yawn.) 

My favourite part was quite possibly the quote from a self-proclaimed “expert” on the Icke family!! Hilarious. 

I won’t spoil it for you. If you fancy a few laughs, read it here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-59853848

I felt compelled to pen an email, as did Jaymie. Within minutes, the article had been edited, stating that Jaymie had been in touch after seeing the piece. No mention of what he actually said though!

Here’s my email to the ‘journalist’ who wrote the story:

“Mr. Williams 

I’ve just read your article – the one that mentions the documentary I researched, co-produced and presented and felt compelled to contact you.

I’ve been a journalist and editor for 36 years and have to say this is the flabbiest, sloppiest piece of ‘journalism’ I’ve ever seen.

Have you actually watched the film? It seems pretty clear to me that you haven’t. 

Your piece is full of lies.  David Icke was not involved in the making of this documentary, nor was it made by “the Icke brothers”. You have done no research. You did not contact anyone involved in the making of the film despite saying you did. You failed to get quotes from the producers, directors or from me. You also failed to get quotes from Anna Redfern. As a result, the article is amateurish, biased, one-sided and ridiculous. 

You need to go back to journalism school. People like you make me ashamed to be a journalist. 

I’d appreciate a reply and would also appreciate a published apology for your lies. 

I’m also writing to your editor and making a formal complaint to the BBC. You’ll also be hearing from my solicitor. 

Looking forward to your response.

Regards,

Jacqui Deevoy

Two days later, I spotted copycat articles in the Mail Online and the Metro. More rubbish. Nothing more than pathetic regurgitations of the BBC piece. Journalists these days seem to have no qualms about copying a story and sticking their own name on it. There used to be a name for that: byline banditry. Only the lowest of the low would put their own byline on another journalist’s work. I’ve been a victim of it many times. It really does happen and the so-called journalists who make a habit of doing it really are despicable. 

I decided to write to my contact at the Mail Online. We’ve worked together for years and she’s always been very pleasant and reasonable. I actually feel sorry for her doing the job she does and hope that soon she’ll see the light and dissociate herself from the crooks that own the media. Here’s what I wrote to her:

Hi xxxxxx

Happy New Year.

I’m very disappointed to see that this pathetic ‘article’, which has pretty much been copied from the dreadful hit piece written by the amateurish BBC journalist Rhys Williams yesterday, has been published by the Mail Online. 

It focuses mainly on cinema owner Anna Redfern but also makes wild allegations on the documentary I produced with Ickonic Media.

The Mail Online article is full of inaccuracies and there has been no attempt to contact me or anyone else involved in the making of the film. Real journalism requires critical thinking and balance and, as you know, it’s also a good idea to perhaps get some quotes from the people mentioned in the story. Journalism is not about regurgitating lies. 

I have become increasingly disappointed in the way papers (print and online) operate these days and articles like this make me ashamed to call myself a journalist. 

I understand you may not have commissioned this (although how a copied story gets commissioned is anyone’s guess), but I wanted to let you know how I feel. I’ve always had a great working relationship with the Mail Online but seeing the undeniable drop in quality of the writing, I don’t feel I can be associated with you anymore. The Mail has become a laughing stock, a comic and many of the so-called writers that are used are beyond a joke. 

Do you have the email address for Kate Dennett? I’d like to speak to her. So would my lawyer.

Thanks.

I then wrote to the newly-resigned editor of the Mail Online – Martin Clarke. As follows:

“Dear Mr. Clarke

Congratulations on your resignation. (I’ve been a freelance journalist for 36 years and, much of the time these days, I feel like resigning myself.)

I gather you’re still available in an advisory capacity, so I’m copying you in on this email, sent by me to one of your editors earlier this evening. 

This is the article I refer to in that email:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10367855/Cinema-owner-fined-15-000-screening-Covid-conspiracy-theory-movie-ordered-close.html

I’d appreciate your comments.

Thanks.”

I also contacted a journalist at The Times who’d been chasing Anna Redfern for an interview. As he seemed to have a keen interest in the film she’d showcased, I offered myself as an interviewee.

The following day, I sent chaser emails to all four. As yet, there has been no response. 

All this goes to highlight the terrible standard of journalism the public is subjected to. It’s as if the papers are being run by teenagers, while the grown ups – the old school journalists – reeling in despair, ‘step down’. The lunatics have well and truly taken over the asylum and true journalism has gone right down the toilet.

I used to tell people not to believe everything they read in the papers: now I tell them not to believe ANYTHING they read in the papers. RIP, real journalism, you’re  going to be missed. 

(‘A Good Death?’ is showing all day on Saturday January 8th at Ickonic.com. Tune in and see what all the fuss is about!)

Ickonic’s groundbreaking exposure documentary about the mass murder of old people by the NHS using the drug Midazolam can be watched for free until 11pm UK time today. It’s so good the BBC and the mainstream media has been attacking the content without actually watching it. Here’s the link …

On Tuesday 4th January BBC Wales wrote an outrageously inaccurate article about the premiere of the documentary A Good Death? which took place at Cinema & Co in Swansea on December 4th..

The article by a Rhys Williams sought to discredit the film on a number of points and was used to further their agenda to target cinema owner Anna Redfern after refusing to comply with the Welsh Government’s decision to implement vaccine passports.
To allow people to watch it and judge it on its own merits, it’s now available to view for free until 11pm GMT on Saturday 8th January – click on this link to watch:

‘There’s The Big Jew, Let’s Get Him!’: Genetic Liar Senator Schumer Claims This A YEAR After January 6th While Producing As Usual No Evidence Whatsoever. He has no shame

Capitol protesters were hunting Jews on Jan 6, according to New York Senator Chuck Schumer (D).

“I was within 30 feet of these nasty, racist, bigoted insurrectionists,” Schumer recalled Thursday on floor of the Senate. “I was told later that one of them reportedly said, ‘There’s the big Jew, let’s get him!’”

 

“I was within 30 feet of these nasty, racist, bigoted insurrectionists .. I was told later that one of them reportedly said ‘There’s the big Jew, let’s get him.’”

— Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on 1/6 anniversary pic.twitter.com/xQbZHdDFrS

— The Recount (@therecount) January 6, 2022

The Recount shared video of Schumer walking down a hallway and then turning around without a single “insurrectionist” in view.

Read More: There’s The Big Jew, Let’s Get Him!’: Genetic Liar Senator Schumer Claims This A YEAR After January 6th While Producing As Usual No Evidence Whatsoever. He has no shame