Passenger is kicked off flight because he ‘had Let’s Go Brandon written in tiny writing on his mask’

A viral video showing a man who was removed from an Allegiant Airlines flight over what appeared to a facemask violation claims it was because his mask allegedly contained the now-famous anti-Joe Biden slogan ‘Let’s Go Brandon.’

The video was posted to Twitter by the account Libs of TikTok and starts with a man arguing with the flight attendant from Allegiant. The stewardess references the ‘comment you’ve written on there’ regarding the message on the mask.

The video’s caption alleges that the mask contained the phrase ‘Let’s Go Brandon,’ a slogan mocking President Joe Biden and the media’s coverage of him.

In the footage, the attendant says to the passenger: ‘Could I ask you to wear a different mask please because of the comment that you have written on there?’ The man says he has a right to express his beliefs but the attendant replies: ‘I’m going to ask you to put a different mask on or I’m going to ask you to leave.’

He says the request is ‘in violation of my rights’ but she insists it is an FAA regulation. When he refuses to change his mask, the stewardess says: ‘Sir, I’m going to have you leave the aircraft now.’

The passenger tries to film the incident but she refuses to give him permission and orders him off the plane.

Read More: Allegiant passenger is kicked off flight because he ‘had Let’s Go Brandon written in tiny writing on his mask’

Canada Gov’t Targets Trump Supporters, Says They ‘Ought to Be Worried’ About Bank Accounts Being Frozen

On Monday, the world — at least the free thinking, non-authoritarian world — was shocked when Canada’s prime minister, Justin Trudeau, declared dictatorial powers over the people of Canada by invoking wartime powers. He then labelled the peaceful protesters terrorists, claimed they were carrying out an “illegal occupation,” claimed the ability to seize their assets without due process using private banks, and empowered police and military to help him carry out those orders.

To anyone who has ever studied history, they see these moves by the Canadian government as a massive step to transform their parliamentary democracy into a fascist state. Freezing assets and government taking money from citizens over a peaceful protest, is a direct afront to any semblance of a free society.

“This is about following the money. This is about stopping the financing of these illegal blockades,” Trudeau’s Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland said during a press conference on Monday. “We are today serving notice if your truck is being used in these illegal blockades your corporate accounts will be frozen.”

While this move was decried by many in the free world and should have been walked back as a mistake by the Canadian government, that did not happen. Instead, the Canadian government has doubled down — this time, going after “Trump supporters” as well.

During another interview on Wednesday night, Canada’s Justice Minister David Lametti told a reporter that anyone who donated money to the Canadian Freedom Convoy, should “be worried” about having their bank accounts frozen.

Read More: Canada Gov’t Targets Trump Supporters, Says They “Ought to Be Worried” About Bank Accounts Being Frozen

Public Health Scotland pulls Covid case rate data over claims it ‘demonstrates conclusively’ that vaccines are not working

PUBLIC Health Scotland will no longer publish weekly data on Covid cases, hospitalisations and deaths from next week after mounting concerns that it is being misused by antivaxxers.

It comes after a former advisor to the Trump administration told a US Senate committee hearing that data from Scotland “demonstrates conclusively that the vaccine is driving massive infections in the vaccinated”.

Paul E Alexander, an epidemiologist and Canadian health researcher, who – as a Trump administration official – advocated for a strategy of mass infection of the public with Covid-19 to build herd immunity, said this was a “big, big problem” during an evidence session chaired by Senator Ron Johnson on January 17.

Dr Alexander was referring to a table published by PHS which showed that by the week beginning January 22, the age-standardised Covid case rate per 100,000 in Scotland was 381.5 among the unvaccinated compared to 570 in the double-vaccinated and 447 per 100,000 in the boosted.

Read more: Public Health Scotland pulls Covid case rate data over claims it ‘demonstrates conclusively’ that vaccines are not working

New York Fashion Week Models Sport Jockstrap ‘Covid’ Masks (Because they are dicks)

Several models walking the runway for the Dion Lee Fall/Winter 2022 show during Monday’s New York Fashion Week events wore odd, panty-like masks.

It only takes looking into the eyes of the models to see they can feel the cringe they’re taking part in. One person wore a lacey blue outfit with a breathe-through jockstrap mask.

Another individual wore all white, with a jockstrap face mask, boots and some sort of skirt. The model below was photographed gazing into the distance while wearing a salmon-colored face thong, a skirt and leather holsters at his sides.

With many liberals longing for face masks to become a permanent part of life in the “new normal” of the Great Reset, perhaps this is their attempt at making the coverings “fashionable.”

Hopefully, they don’t hold their breath while waiting for this style to catch on.

Read More: We Saw It, So Now You Have To – New York Fashion Week Models Sport Jockstrap Covid Masks

‘Housing Affordability Is Getting Crushed’: Costlier Loans Push “American Dream” Out of Reach For First-Time Buyers – this plan was in my books decades ago

As consumer-goods inflation has continued to surprise economists and shoppers alike with its ferocity, increasingly costly mortgages are putting first-time home buyers at a worsening disadvantage, and placing the ‘American Dream’ of owning one’s home even further out of reach.

Bidding has already driven home prices to unprecedented highs, but growing demand for loans has sent mortgage rates to levels unseen in years. The cost for a 30-year loan has just hit a two-year high, having risen 20% since Christmas, Bloomberg reports.

While those who already own homes have the advantage of benefiting from rising prices in their previous home, allowing them to more easily trade up, first-time buyers must make do with rising prices and rising mortgage rates.

Costs for 30-year loans hit a more than two-year high of 3.69% last week, rising about 20% just since Christmas. Further increases are expected as the Federal Reserve, trying to curb inflation, hikes its benchmark rate. That’s a daunting prospect for entry-level buyers when affordability is already at its worst since 2018.

And as we reported earlier this month, first-time buyers are already seeing their finances stretched thin as those who have managed to buy have seen the percentage of their incomes spent on mortgage payments jump to about 25.6%, according to the NAR. That’s the highest in three years.

Read More:“Housing Affordability Is Getting Crushed”: Costlier Loans Push “American Dream” Out of Reach For First-Time Buyers

Corrupt JCVI Advises Jab for 5 to 11-year-olds, But Don’t Advise Us of Their Links With Pfizer & The Gates Foundation

On February 16th 2020, they advised a non-urgent offer to all 5 to 11-year-olds of 2 (10mcg) doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech paediatric vaccine.

Are they in a position to advise COVID vaccinations to our children when they have failed to declare their conflicts of interest and big monies received in their workplace from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation?

The following information has been sourced from a “deep dive” search conducted by Dr Zoe Harcombe.

The JCVI issued a statement on February 16th:
“The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has updated its vaccination advice for children aged 5 to 11, with a view to increasing protection against potential future waves of coronavirus (COVID-19).

“Although this age group is generally at very low risk of serious illness from the virus, a very small number of children who get infected do develop severe disease.

“Latest evidence suggests that offering the vaccine ahead of another potential wave will protect this very small number of children from serious illness and hospitalisation – and will also provide some short-term protection against mild infection across the age group.

“The committee has therefore advised a non-urgent offer to all 5 to 11-year-olds of 2 (10mcg) doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech paediatric vaccine. The 2 doses should be given with an interval of at least 12 weeks between doses.

“The recommendation should not displace the delivery of other non-COVID-19 childhood vaccinations or any other part of the COVID-19 vaccination programme” (source).

Not one member of the JCVI COVID -19 subcommittee who was responsible for that statement declared conflicts of interest. However, the majority of them have links to the pharmaceutical companies and/or Gates Foundation through the money for their research or their institutions receiving huge amounts of money from them.

The Members of the JCVI
The JCVI has a COVID-19 sub-committee which has 15 core members and one lay member.

Professor Anthony Harnden, Deputy Chair (University of Oxford)
Dr Kevin Brown (Public Health England)
Dr Rebecca Cordery (Public Health England)
Dr Maggie Wearmouth (East Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust)
Professor Matt Keeling (University of Warwick)
Alison Lawrence (lay member)
Professor Robert Read (Southampton General Hospital)
Professor Anthony Scott (London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine)
Professor Adam Finn (University of Bristol)
Dr Fiona van der Klis (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Netherlands)
Professor Maarten Postma (University of Groningen)
Professor Simon Kroll (Imperial College London)
Dr Martin Williams (University Hospitals Bristol)
Professor Jeremy Brown (University College London Hospitals)
“The overall chair of the JCVI is Professor Andrew Pollard, Chair (University of Oxford). The membership details reported, “In order to prevent any perceived conflict of interest it was agreed that the JCVI Chair (Professor Andrew Pollard), who is involved in the development of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine at Oxford, would recuse himself from all JCVI COVID-19 meetings.”

Five of them had provided additional information in the “non-declaration” that did in fact reveal, conflicts of interest. Additionally, a “cursory” search on the remaining members, was carried out by Dr Zoe Harcombe that was to reveal that six members had conflicts of interest which included, running a COVID-19 vaccine trial to being their organisation’s representative for Pfizer.

Read More : Corrupt JCVI Advises Jab for 5 to 11-year-olds

How To Remove Graphene Oxide from The Body

Graphene oxide, a substance that is poisonous to humans, has been found in the Covid 19 “vaccines”, in the water supply, in the air we breathe through chemtrails, and is even in our food supply. Graphene oxide interacts and is activated by electromagnetic frequencies (“EMF”), specifically the broader range of frequencies found in 5G which can cause even more damage to our health.

The symptoms of graphene oxide poisoning and EMF radiation sickness are similar to those symptoms described as Covid. The good news is, now that graphene oxide has been identified as a contaminant, there are ways to remove graphene oxide from our bodies and restore your health.

This is a holistic approach of using several different methods simultaneously for the best effect. Including, specific supplements to degrade the graphene oxide in the body, and controlling EMFs in the environment to minimize graphene oxide activation.

This information comes from several sources and is based on scientific studies. Links are reference below.

Understanding Glutathione
Glutathione is a substance made from the amino acids: glycine, cysteine, and glutamic acid. It is produced naturally by the liver and involved in many processes in the body, including tissue building and repair, making chemicals and proteins needed in the body, and for the immune system. We have a natural glutathione reserve in our bodies. This is what gives us a strong immune system.

When glutathione levels are high in the body, we have no problems and our immune system functions well. But when the amount of graphene oxide in the body exceeds the amount of glutathione, it causes the collapse of the immune system and triggers a cytokine storm. The way that graphene oxide can rapidly grow to exceed glutathione in the body is by electronic excitation. Meaning, EMF’s that bombard the graphene to oxidise it, which rapidly triggers the disease.

At the age of 65 glutathione levels fall drastically in the body. This can explain why the population most affected by Covid-19 are the elderly. Glutathione levels are also very low in people with pre-existing conditions such as diabetes, obesity, etc. Likewise, glutathione levels are very high in infants, children and athletes. This can explain why Covid-19 has not affected these people.

Read More : How To Remove Graphene Oxide from The Body

Cult-Owned Fascist New Zealand: Threats to Seize Property If Fines For ‘Covid-19 Testing Non-Compliance’ Are Not Paid

According to an image being shared on social media, a fine of $300 was issued in the first week of January 2022 for Covid testing non-compliance in New Zealand.  It violates inalienable rights and freedoms to enforce medical procedures and when courts threaten fundamental rights because of disobedience to diktats it’s an indication the system is not working to the benefit of the people but for someone or something else.

The first fines for non-compliance with Covid-19 testing requirements were issued in July 2021 to 18 border workers. Routine Covid-19 testing had been mandatory for workers in specific roles at New Zealand’s sea and air borders and at MIQ facilities since August 2020.

The Ministry of Health’s director of public health Caroline McElnay said moving from monitoring to enforcement was a precautionary but necessary approach to keep Covid-19 out of the community, the New Zealand Herald reported at the time.

What is more sinister than the penalties for not complying with diktats to use tests – which are unable to detect live infection and are therefore meaningless in controlling the spread of an infectious disease – are the threats noted at the bottom of the penalty notice:

“If you don’t pay or arrange payment the court can:

issue a warrant for your arrest
Suspend your driver’s licence

Seize and sell your property, or take money from your income or bank account
Report your overdue fine as part of your credit reference check – meaning you may or may not be able to get a loan, credit card or hire purchase

Restrict your ability to sell property

Stop you from travelling overseas”

Read More: New Zealand: Threats to Seize Property If Fines For “Covid-19 Testing Non-Compliance” Are Not Paid

First Do No Harm: Unintended Consequences of [Fake] Vaccinating Children Against ‘Covid’. No, mate INTENDED consequences

COVID-19 vaccination is now to be offered to all five to 11 year olds across the United Kingdom. This follows an extraordinary Government-led push to vaccinate older children and young adults.

It is difficult to imagine a scenario where caution and careful consideration would be more necessary than vaccinating healthy children against an illness that poses such a low risk of serious illness and death to them.

When I began at medical school, I remember being somewhat bemused that the ancient Greek physician Hippocrates was best known for his dictum “first do no harm”. It just seemed so trite, even obvious. If this man was the father of modern medicine, surely there must be a more profound primary insight that had been passed down from generation to generation of physicians.

The more I have gone on in the medical profession, the more I have come to understand and respect the importance of this simple but profound injunction. I suspect that any doctor that has spent time treating patients will agree. It is deceptively easy to worsen a situation one is trying to help. The problem, simply put, is unintended consequences. Human beings are extraordinarily complex: physiologically, psychologically and sociologically. And unfortunately we, as physicians, are not as good as we would like to be, despite astonishing advances in modern medicine. It is therefore something of a natural law, that when dealing with complexity, it is very much easier to make things worse than to make things better. This was the genius of Hippocrates’ powerful insight.

While many of these unintended consequences fall into the category of ‘unknown unknowns’ (to quote an unlikely source), others derive from our earnest desire to do something, even if we don’t know the effect. This is particularly problematic when a serious and often tragic calamity occurs and in our sincere desire to help, one can overreact and paradoxically worsen the outcome in the long-run. There is also a much more insidious problem: that of dismissing inconvenient truths or ‘wilful blindness’. The motivations behind this are often complicated and not always nefarious, but the results are serious.

It may be unpopular, but there are inconvenient facts here that require careful consideration. COVID-19 is a mild illness in the vast majority of children and young adults. It is simply the case that the virus is endemic now, and while vaccination has mercifully made an impact in reducing disease severity and mortality in those at risk, it has not been able to interrupt transmission in a manner that would terminate the circulation of the virus. This has removed much of the rationale for vaccinating children.

We ignore these issues at our peril as there are significant side-effects associated with these vaccines; they may not be common, but they are there. Myocarditis and cardiac arrhythmias, neurological side-effects and thrombotic complications are issues that cannot be ignored. Furthermore, there are still unknowns associated with the COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the novel mRNA and DNA platforms, as these platforms simply do not have safety data longer in duration than two years. The knock-on effects on public confidence in all vaccines if there is a bad outcome could be catastrophic.

Mandating medical therapies, particularly for those who are well, requires the most careful consideration and cannot be justified in my view except in extreme situations. In the case of children and young adults and COVID-19 vaccination, even the slender thread of justification was severed when it was clear that these vaccinations were not preventing children being infected and transmitting the virus.

The tale of the HMS Titanic that sank in 1912 following a collision with an iceberg may well be prescient. The hubris of its builders, who were so confident in its safety they dubbed it ‘unsinkable’, is well-known. Clearly, there were ‘unknown unknowns’ rendering this confidence misplaced. But perhaps more interesting was the reaction afterwards. Titanic had 20 lifeboats, able to accommodate 1,178 people, while it sailed with 2,223 passengers on board. Of course, this was not considered particularly problematic given the certainty in the minds of many that this ship was unsinkable. When the ship did sink, many died for lack of lifeboat space.

Read More : First Do No Harm