Ukraine won the ‘geek war’ but it wasn’t enough on the front line

In the early stages of the full-scale invasion, Ukrainian ingenuity and ability to adapt commercially available equipment helped stem the Russian advance. It proved less useful on the eastern front line, when Ukraine needed heavy weapons. But a year after the invasion, there’s little doubt that Ukraine’s DIY ingenuity has left a lasting mark on modern warfare.

NHS Paid Billions for Private Hospital Beds to Prevent a Backlog But Never Bothered to Use Them

Back in the scary but innocent days of March 2020 the Government and NHS sought to maximise hospital capacity. This was surely the right thing to do, given the uncertainty of the pandemic, but many of its efforts backfired badly.

First, NHS Hospitals decanted bed-blockers without testing them for SARS-CoV-2. Some were infected, igniting lethal nursing-home outbreaks. Secondly, the Government commissioned Nightingale Hospitals to great fanfare. Unfortunately, as it should have perceived beforehand and soon discovered, there weren’t enough doctors and nurses to staff these facilities. The Nightingales quietly closed over the subsequent months, having treated derisory numbers of patients. Some treated no one at all. Half a billion of taxpayers’ money went pop. Third, the Government spent £2 billion to buy-up capacity at private hospitals, which did have staff, beds and expertise. The BMJ, whose article is worth reading in full, has managed – after multiple FOI requests – to analyse how this turned out, and it isn’t pretty.

In the BMJ’s words:

The major deal bought the entire capacity of 200 private hospitals, including 8,000 private beds, 1,200 ventilators, 700 doctors and 10,000 nurses, to help the NHS care for patients with COVID-19, with cancer, or needing urgent operations…

The national contract block booked beds, equipment, and staff… It allowed NHS teams to take over whole departments of private hospitals if necessary. NHS England agreed to pay for the bulk of the hospitals’ operating costs, including staff, consumables, rent, capital expenditure, building modifications and infrastructure.

According to the BMJ, the March 2020 plan was for this extra capacity to be used for Covid patients, but this changed in May 2020, with the independent sector told to concentrate upon elective patients whose surgery had been delayed whilst the NHS concentrated upon Covid. I believe that this was true of provincial England but that, from the start, the London plan was that the NHS would handle Covid whilst contracted private sites remained ‘Covid clear’ and undertook medical and surgical treatments that would otherwise be delayed.

Read More: NHS Paid Billions for Private Hospital Beds to Prevent a Backlog But Never Bothered to Use Them

 

Minnesota Bar Owner Faces $350,000 In Fines For Defying State COVID-19 Restrictions

A Minnesota bar owner lost her business, liquor and food service licenses, and is facing up to $350,000 in fines for violating a governor’s executive order. But the Minnesota Attorney General’s lawsuit doesn’t list any actual harm caused by her actions.

I didn’t break the law; I defied the executive order,” Lisa Monet Zarza told The Epoch Times.

Zarza’s attorney, Richard Dahl of Brainerd, Minnesota, did not respond to a request for comment by The Epoch Times. Nor did the Minnesota Attorney General’s office.

The lawsuit was filed in Minnesota District Court in Dakota County. It alleges that Lionheart LLC, doing business as Alibi Drinkery of Lakeville, Minnesota, opened for business illegally from Dec. 16–30, 2020.

Gov. Tm Walz had ordered bars, restaurants, and other businesses closed to stem the spread of the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) virus, commonly known as the novel coronavirus.

It was one of a series of executive orders issued from March 2020 to June 2021 after Walz declared a “peacetime emergency.” A review of available data by The Epoch Times indicates Walz’s orders likely accomplished nothing toward controlling the spread of the CCP virus.

Zarza said that she and her business partner had complied with all state mandates up to that point. They closed for the initial two-week period in March 2020 to “flatten the curve.” They offered take-out service and outdoor dining as much as they could.

Zarza said Alibi Drinkery never reported an issue and was never connected to any COVID cases.

We closed exactly how they said,” she said.

The peacetime emergency declaration, approved by the legislature, allowed Walz to issue edicts with the power of law. One of those was Executive Order 20-99.

It was issued on Nov. 19, 2020, in response to a spike in positive tests for the virus in the state.

Read More: Minnesota Bar Owner Faces $350,000 In Fines For Defying State COVID-19 Restrictions

 

Frightening Poll Shows Half of Britons Support Tony Blair’s Proposal for National Digital ID Cards

Sir Tony Blair, together with ex-Tory leader William Hague, has called on the Government to introduce a digital ID that people can have on their phones that would hold details such as their passport, driving licence, tax records, qualifications and right to work status. Frighteningly, a poll by YouGov (who else?) showed that more than half of respondents supported such an invasive and high-risk surveillance project. The Mail has more.

Sir Tony – who attempted to introduce ID cards while in Downing Street – insisted that new biometric technology would overcome concerns about online dangers.

He and Lord Hague have insisted that a “fundamental reshaping of the state around technology” is needed amid a “radically” shaping world.

Critics hit back at the push for digital IDs, with ex-Tory chairman Sir Jake Berry branding it “a creepy state plan to track you from the cradle to the grave”.

Campaign group Big Brother Watch condemned Sir Tony for “reviving failed proposals for an intrusive mass digital identity system and a database state”.

But a snap poll by YouGov revealed more than half of Britons (54%) would support the introduction of a system of national ID cards in Britain.

According to the survey of more than 4,000 adults today, almost a quarter (23%) said they would strongly support national ID cards, with 31% saying they would tend to support such a plan.

This compared to 13% who said they would tend to oppose the introduction of national ID cards and 14% who said they would strongly oppose such a plan. Almost one in five (18%) replied “don’t know”. …

Outlining their proposals [in a joint article for the Times] for a shake-up of Whitehall – including digital IDs for every citizen – they also called for “a national health infrastructure that uses data to improve care and keep costs down, and sovereign AI systems backed by supercomputing capabilities”. …

In an interview with BBC Radio 4’s Today programme this morning, Sir Tony highlighted how countries “as small as Estonia and as large as India’ are moving towards digital IDs. If you look at the biometric technology that allows you to do digital ID today, it can overcome many of these problems,” he added.

Read More: Frightening Poll Shows Half of Britons Support Tony Blair’s Proposal for National Digital ID Cards

 

US Judge Says Families of 9/11 Victims Not Entitled to Afghan Central Bank Funds

A US judge has determined that families of the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks are not entitled to Afghan central bank funds that the Biden administration has seized.

During the Taliban takeover of Afghanistan and the US withdrawal in 2021, the Biden administration froze $7 billion in Afghan central bank reserves that are held by the Federal Reserve. Biden signed an order to make half of the funds available for 9/11 families even though the people of Afghanistan had nothing to do with the attacks.

US District Judge George Daniels in Manhattan said that allowing the money to go to 9/11 families would amount to recognizing the Taliban as the legitimate government. Daniels said he didn’t have the power to do so since the Biden administration doesn’t recognize the Taliban-led government that holds power in Kabul.

A lawyer from one group of 9/11 families said they disagreed with the decision and will appeal. But other family members of victims of the attacks called on President Biden to release the funds to Afghans.

“Any use of the $7 billion to pay off 9/11 family member judgments is legally suspect and morally wrong. We call on you to modify your Executive Order and affirm that the Afghanistan central bank funds belong to the Afghan people and the Afghan people alone,” the families said in a letter to Biden sent in August 2022.

The letter said that the families joined other lawsuits over the attacks but that “no 9/11 family member joined these lawsuits to take money away from starving Afghans.”

The Biden administration said it would put the other $3.5 billion in a Swiss bank account to be used for aid for Afghanistan that would bypass the Taliban. But it’s not clear if the money has been disbursed.

Besides the frozen funds, the US still maintains sanctions on Taliban leaders who are now part of the Afghan government. The sanctions discourage international companies and banks from doing business in Afghanistan, making it harder for Afghans to find relief.

The UN recently warned that six million Afghans are facing the risk of famine, but the US has shown no interest in removing sanctions on the Taliban or releasing the frozen funds.

Read More: US Judge Says Families of 9/11 Victims Not Entitled to Afghan Central Bank Funds

 

Without Digital ID The 4th Industrial Revolution falls, Hold Your Line

TONY BLAIR – Backed by the UN Agenda 30, WEF, NATO, WHO AND UNICEF now in the final push for Digital ID.

Without Digital ID The 4th Industrial Revolution falls!

Their reset of society absolutely depends on it!

Hold. Your. Line!

pic.twitter.com/5lS2r8KWii

— Bernie’s Tweets (@BernieSpofforth) February 22, 2023

 

Cenotaph on Scotland Yard’s Secret List of Suspect Statues

Statues of Winston Churchill, Horatio Nelson, Earl Mountbatten of Burma and Oliver Cromwell, as well as the Cenotaph, are on a list of ‘contentious’ statutes compiled by Scotland Yard. The Telegraph has more.

The Cenotaph, Britain’s chief national war memorial, has been placed on a secret Scotland Yard list of “contentious statues” prone to attack because of their links to war, imperialism or slavery.

The former Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s statue in Parliament Square is also included on the list because of his claims that British imperialism was for the good of the “primitive” and “subject races”, although he is wrongly accused in it of murdering three million Indians.

The list has been uncovered by the think tank Policy Exchange through freedom of information requests as part of an investigation into what it claims is declining law and order and increasing squalor around the Palace of Westminster.

The report, Tarnished Jewel, cites police data that shows violent crime has risen two and a half times faster in the streets around Parliament than in London as a whole, and three times faster than in the borough of Westminster as a whole.

It says police have allowed serious potential security threats to develop in the area, while extreme right and left-wing protesters have been able to threaten MPs, ministers and journalists.

The report’s author, Andrew Gilligan, a former political aide to Boris Johnson and a journalist, said: “Nowhere else in Europe, with the possible exception of the Eiffel Tower, is more famous, or more emblematic of its nation. Yet what should be a showpiece has declined into a degree of squalor and disorder.”

The list of statues explains why they might be targeted by protesters including the Cenotaph, which it says “functions as the UK’s official national war memorial”.

Read More: Cenotaph on Scotland Yard’s Secret List of Suspect Statues

 

Boris Johnson “Now is the moment to accelerate our support for Ukraine and give the heroic Ukrainian military the tools it needs to finish the job”

Now is the moment to accelerate our support for Ukraine and give the heroic Ukrainian military the tools it needs to finish the job.

Putin must and will be defeated. pic.twitter.com/gBDHUQI7CI

— Boris Johnson (@BorisJohnson) February 21, 2023

 

Transhumanism: What Is It And Why Is It Evil?

Transhumanism is a very strong trend among the Western élites. Its aim is to overcome the natural limitations of human biology using technology.

Proponents of transhumanism, including Yuval Harari and Klaus Schwab, believe in ideas such as these:

that we can improve the human body to create cyborgs, which are fictive organisms in which human organs and technology are seamlessly combined;
that properties such as human intelligence can be genetically enhanced by germline genome manipulation;
that mRNA technology will soon allow us to “write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers” (as worded in President Biden’s Executive Order on biotechnology);
that we will soon cure cancer using genetic or even nano-mechanic (tiny machine) therapies;
that machines will shortly be able to read thoughts;
that there is no free will because the mind is a collection of biochemical processes;
that soon we will obtain digital immortality by “uploading our minds to the cloud”;
that “artificial intelligence” (AI) will soon lead to machines more intelligent than humans;
and either
that AI will make most humans useless to society because all their work will be taken over by machines,
or
that we will be able to genetically reprogram the sex of adult humans in the near future—

to name just a few of the ideas they espouse.

Why is all of this unscientific balderdash? And why do so many—including clever people like the billionaire Elon Musk—believe in it? What are the roots and goals of this movement? Let’s answer these questions in reverse order.

What are the transhumanists’ goals?

There are two groups of transhumanists.

The first group sees transhumanism as the ultimate method of self-actualisation (alias self-realisation), supposedly allowing those who think they can afford this eye-wateringly expensive alleged self-improvement to escape the biological limits of their bodies. For example, the transhumanist Martine Rothblatt, whose cells have the XY karyotype but who “became” a woman, says that self-defining one’s gender is just the first step on a path that will lead to a cure for cancer and other lethal diseases and ultimately to digital immortality.

Related to this goal, but of lesser importance, is the idea that transhumanism could promote universal equality of outcomes in the tradition of the French Enlightenment ideal of equality by law (as opposed to the Protestant Enlightenment ideal of equality under the law, or isonomy). In this flavour, transhumanism has an emancipatory character akin to abolitionism (the fight against slavery in the nineteenth century) or feminist emancipation, the absurd idea that both sexes should be equal in every respect. Proponents of this variant of the creed believe that all human beings could be altered using transhumanistic technology to achieve equality of outcomes. We will see in the last two sections below that none of these hopes can be fulfilled.

Read More: Transhumanism: What Is It And Why Is It Evil?