California appears to be waging war on internet freedom, writes Norman Lewis in Spiked, with two new laws that effectively treat all citizens like children by imposing severe censorship requirements to prevent “harm”.
Last week, California governor Gavin Newsom signed off a new social-media transparency law that poses a serious threat to free speech. Known as AB 587, the law will force social-media companies to disclose their content-moderation policies, and submit detailed descriptions of their efforts to police speech in certain categories, including hate speech, extremism and harassment. Failure to demonstrate that they are regulating, editing and no doubt censoring what appears on their platforms could land social media companies with big fines.
As noted by Eric Goldman, a Law Professor at Santa Clara University School of Law, the law will have draconian consequences. It effectively forces social media companies to please the regulatory authorities now empowered to watch over them.
But that was not the only attack on online freedom launched by California lawmakers last week. Newsom also signed the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act into law. This is arguably an even more troubling move than AB 587.
The Age-Appropriate Design Code Act aims to protect children from harmful online content, by insisting that children’s interests are prioritised when businesses are designing and developing their online services. This law effectively insists that all internet users should be treated like children.
After all, the law will apply to any business “likely to be accessed by a child”, or unable to establish the age of its consumers “with a reasonable level of certainty” – which goes for most businesses. Businesses will therefore have to assume that the child, defined by the act as any individual under 18, is the default user.